Safety Management System · Example organizations

Three organizations. Three stages of maturity.

Explore how the same SMS connects work, controls, evidence and decisions as a system develops.

Fictional demonstration · Read only. All organizations, people, records and results are invented. Scenario snapshot: October 23, 2026. Maturity percentages describe system development. The OSHA bar covers listed documentation only; no worksite or condition compliance finding is made. Examples do not establish real employer compliance or certification.

Basic compliance · Fictional example

Cedar Creek Interior Contractors

Open my SMS workspace →

REQUIREMENTS & GAPS

Review documentation and system gaps.

OSHA documentation coverage is separate from workplace conditions and the ANSI/ASSP Z10 management-system review.

OSHA documentation review coverage

Listed documentation reviewed
100%2 of 2 listed documentation items reviewed
0 excluded from documentation score
Verified 2Recorded gap 0Verification needed 0Not reviewed / unknown 0

Illustrative sample register. Documentation review only. 100% means the listed applicable documentation minimums have been reviewed against current records. It makes no claim about worksite conditions, implementation, employee exposure, or overall OSHA compliance, and does not guarantee protection from a citation.

✓ No documentation gaps remain in these listed reviews as of 2026-10-23. Worksite and condition compliance are not assessed.

View reviewed documentation / exclusions

ANSI/ASSP Z10 reviewed requirements

Gaps recorded
43%3 of 7 listed requirements verified
0 reviewed as not applicable
Verified 3Recorded gap 4Verification needed 0Not reviewed / unknown 0

Illustrative sample register. 100% means all listed applicable items have current supporting evidence and a recorded review. Register completeness and Z10 conformity require a separate full-scope assessment.

Z10 gaps & outstanding reviews

View verified / not applicable items
Minimum OSHA documentation baselines (6)

These selected federal documentation baselines are not a complete applicability matrix. Confirm coverage, exceptions, State Plan rules and current standard-specific directives for the work.

The FOM guides enforcement; its case-file documentation instructions concern inspectors. Employer paperwork minimums come from the applicable standard. FOM Chapter 5 and CPL 02-00-111 provide enforcement context; this tool does not determine citation outcomes.

Hazard communication written program

29 CFR 1910.1200(e); construction: 1926.59 ↗

Covered hazardous-chemical work; confirm exemptions and the applicable general-industry or construction provisions.

  • Workplace-specific methods for labels / warnings, safety data sheets and employee information / training.
  • Hazardous-chemical list using identifiers that connect to the labels and SDSs.
  • Methods to explain hazards of non-routine tasks and chemicals in unlabeled pipes, where present.
  • For covered multi-employer work: methods for SDS access, protective precautions and the workplace labeling system.

Maintain the program for the workplace and make it available as required by 1910.1200(e)(4). Review changes in chemicals and work. Do not infer a universal fixed retention period from this paragraph.

Construction fall-protection training certification

29 CFR 1926.503(b) ↗

Construction workers covered by the fall-hazard training requirement in 1926.503(a).

  • Employee name or other identity.
  • Training date(s).
  • Trainer signature or employer signature.
  • When relying on another employer’s training or training before the rule, record the date the employer determined it adequate rather than an invented training date.

Maintain the latest training certification under 1926.503(b)(2). This record review does not establish that training occurred, was adequate, or that fall protection is in use.

Powered industrial truck training certification

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6) ↗

Covered powered industrial truck operators; evaluate the actual equipment, roles and jurisdiction.

  • Operator name.
  • Training date.
  • Evaluation date.
  • Identity of the person(s) providing training and evaluation.

Keep certification current with the training and evaluation obligations in 1910.178(l). The certification does not replace training, practical evaluation or safe operation.

PPE hazard-assessment certification

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2) ↗

General-industry PPE hazard assessments covered by 1910.132(d) and (g); this is not a universal construction paperwork rule.

  • Workplace evaluated.
  • Person certifying the assessment was performed.
  • Assessment date(s).
  • Identification of the document as a hazard-assessment certification.

Keep the certification identifiable and retrievable for the covered assessment. This clause does not itself specify a universal years-long retention period. The review does not verify the assessment or PPE in actual work.

Written energy-control procedure

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4) ↗

Covered servicing / maintenance; any claimed written-procedure exception requires reviewing every condition in 1910.147(c)(4)(i).

  • Equipment / procedure scope, purpose, authorization, rules, techniques and enforcement arrangements.
  • Specific use of the procedure and steps to shut down, isolate, block and secure equipment.
  • Steps and responsibility for placing, removing and transferring energy-control devices.
  • Specific testing requirements to determine that isolation and controls are effective.

Maintain applicable procedures and review them when work or equipment changes. This documentation review does not verify energy isolation or safe servicing.

Energy-control periodic-inspection certification

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii) ↗

Periodic inspections of covered energy-control procedures.

  • Machine or equipment covered by the inspected procedure.
  • Inspection date.
  • Employees included in the inspection.
  • Person performing the inspection.

Keep the certification tied to the required periodic inspection. The required inspection frequency is at least annual under 1910.147(c)(6)(i); this is not a separate universal multi-year retention rule.

FOM — records review ↗ · FOM — case files and written programs ↗ · Paperwork and written-program citation policy ↗

What moves the bars?

OSHA documentation credit requires a cited minimum, findings against that minimum, availability / currency / retention information, a named reviewer, current documentation evidence, and a completed minimum checklist where supplied. The reviewer records document findings and completes the checklist. Field observations alone do not earn documentation credit. ANSI/Z10 review credit continues to require implementation evidence and review findings. Recorded gaps, unresolved linked actions, changed or overdue evidence, and undetermined applicability remain visible. Reviewed not-applicable items are excluded. A reviewed OSHA paragraph with no express documentation duty is excluded from the documentation score; operational duties remain separate. Each listed requirement has equal weight; a single serious gap still needs action regardless of the percentage.

The Z10 review uses the edition and references recorded in each item. The existing 30-group development assessment remains a separate indicator. Demo registers are deliberately limited examples, not complete regulatory or standard checklists.

OSHA program evaluation guidance ↗ · ANSI/ASSP Z10 standard information ↗

Requirements & gaps

Review one applicable OSHA or ANSI/ASSP Z10 requirement for a defined scope. Record implementation, gaps, supporting evidence, reviewer and next review date. The register covers only the requirements entered.

9 examples

Compare strengths and next steps, rather than treating a score as a pass/fail result. These fictional examples remain separate from private organization records, paid program editions and research participation.

Return to SMS preview →