JHA / JSA / AHA builderConcrete Pump Hopper and Agitator Cleanout JHA
A JHA breaks the work into steps, hazards and controls. Use this example to build a draft for your actual job and review it with your crew.
Just need the example? Download it here.For the crew
You know the work. Let’s turn that experience into a plan your crew can talk through. Start with today’s job, then check the steps together.
Let’s build your JHA.
Step 1 of 4 · Working draft
Your job
Tell Jenkins what you’re planning and where the work will happen. Use the actual job details.
Use the published example’s suggestions when they fit your task, or write your own steps. These are planned controls, not verified worksite conditions.
Describe an observable step, how someone could be harmed, and the control that acts on that hazard. Identify who checks it and what evidence is needed.
Walk through the plan with the people doing the work. Resolve missing controls and agree who checks them. Moving to the next step does not approve the work.
Confirm people, equipment and emergency arrangements
Record changes, checks, and open actions
Walk the work area, review with the crew, and resolve missing controls. Follow the required approval process. This tool does not judge completeness, verify signatures or authorize work.
Print your own JHA by signing in, or contribute the selected structured categories as a guest. Signing in does not require research participation. Written job details are processed to prepare your export and are stored on our server only if you save to your private company library.
Research purpose, data fields, retention and withdrawal · Privacy notice
Sign-in uses a free account. Your tab draft is retained for the return from sign-in.
Hosted organization saving requires active jSMS access and a company workspace. View jSMS plans.
The export uses landscape pages, task-only continuation pages and a Page X of Y footer in current Chrome or Edge. Review every page. Opening an export is not proof that the JHA was printed or used. The PDF includes its research choice and reference; the private withdrawal link stays in the export’s screen-only receipt.
Device storage and other draft options
Device copies may contain private job information. Clear them when using a shared device.
Your entries stay in this working draft as you move between steps. Required field checks, employer review and work authorization remain separate.
Your Concrete Pump Hopper and Agitator Cleanout JHA
Walk through the job in order. Use these possible hazards, planned controls and checks to start a conversation about your actual work.
011. Define the permitted cleaning boundary
Possible hazards: A delivery-line cleanout plan or an assumed empty hopper can be mistaken for authority to access moving concrete valves or an agitator.
Planned controls: Pump operator and cleaning lead identify the exact pump and current routine cleaning instructions. Establish permitted external access and tools, required isolation and washwater capture. Confirm the delivery system’s separate safe status and assign authorized isolation and restoration roles. Keep hardened deposits, uncertain line conditions and repairs outside this routine operation.
Check before work: Lead verifies model instructions, permitted access and assigned roles.
022. Prepare protected external positions
Possible hazards: Wet concrete contact, an unstable work position or a person beside the pump can cause burns, falls or exposure when cleaning begins.
Planned controls: Crew establishes stable external access, hose routing and a restricted area around the hopper and washwater collection. Provide task-selected eye, skin and footwear protection and accessible washing arrangements. Remove pressure to work from a wheel, frame member or unsupported platform; keep neighboring crews clear and prevent collected washwater entering walking routes or drains.
Check before work: Lead checks protected access, containment and the restricted area.
033. Isolate and verify hazardous energy
Possible hazards: Unexpected starting, residual hydraulic force or component movement can crush a worker or drive a cleaning tool back toward the operator.
Planned controls: Authorized personnel follow the actual pump-specific procedure to identify, isolate, lock and tag every hazardous energy source and control residual energy and possible movement. Perform the prescribed verification before releasing permitted guard removal or tool access. Do not use the hopper interlock, emergency stop, an idle engine or a single gauge as a substitute for the required verified condition.
Check before work: Authorized person reports actual isolation and verification findings before access.
044. Clean only the permitted external areas
Possible hazards: Overreaching, unsuitable tools or forced removal of set concrete can put a person into the mechanism, damage components or spray caustic residue.
Planned controls: Crew follows the model’s routine cleaning method using its permitted tools and external positions while isolation remains controlled. Capture rinse and residues through the planned receiver. Keep body parts outside the hopper and mechanism; stop if the reach, deposits or obstruction exceed the routine method. Obtain a separate servicing plan rather than leaning in, cycling the agitator or hammering hardened material.
Check before work: Lead observes that tools and reach remain within permitted boundaries.
055. Restore guards before releasing the cleaning area
Possible hazards: A missing grate, retained tool or defeated interlock can leave dangerous access available when the pump is restarted.
Planned controls: After permitted cleaning, account for tools and residues and restore every affected guard and safety device according to the model instructions. Report damage for authorized correction and maintain the out-of-service condition until required findings are resolved. Keep isolation under the authorized person’s control; the cleaning crew’s completion statement alone does not release a restart.
Check before work: Operator verifies guard restoration and unresolved defects before restoration.
066. Complete the controlled return and handover
Possible hazards: Premature energy restoration or unclear ownership can expose someone still cleaning or send an unresolved defect to the next operator.
Planned controls: Authorized personnel use the employer’s controlled restoration procedure after confirming all affected people are clear, tools removed and required guards restored. Operator performs only the prescribed protected readiness checks. Record cleaning completion, isolation and restoration findings and any held equipment; communicate residual cleanup and maintenance restrictions to the receiving lead without inventing a successful inspection.
Check before work: Lead verifies clearance, responsible restoration and recorded equipment disposition.
Example scope and starting conditions
A trained crew will clean permitted pump hopper and agitator areas after a building pour from external protected positions. Before permitted guard or tool access, authorized personnel lock, tag and verify all hazardous energy through the actual pump procedure. Guards are restored before controlled return to service. This fictional learning example describes planned controls; it records no actual inspection or work authorization.
- The operator obtains the identified pump’s applicable cleaning, isolation and guard-restoration instructions. The delivery line is separately made safe; this example gives no pipeline or accumulator-release sequence.
- Permitted external positions, tools and containment are planned. No hopper or water-box entry or bodily reach into mechanisms is allowed; a grate, interlock or emergency stop is not energy isolation.
- The cleanout link 238110-17 is partial: routine external hopper and agitator cleaning only. Delivery-line water or compressed-air cleanout, blocked-line work, hydraulic repair, entry and removal of hard cured deposits require separate analyses.
Know when to pause
- The exact permitted cleaning access or pump-specific isolation and verification method cannot be established.
- Residual energy, unexpected movement, damaged guarding or an unresolved isolation condition is found.
- Deposits, reach or defects require entry, bodily access, hard-concrete removal, blockage clearing or repair beyond the routine method.
After a pause, correct the condition, reassess the work, and obtain required authorization before restarting.
Free example and template
No account required. The worked example contains planned controls. The blank template is for your own work; neither includes fabricated inspection results, signatures or approval.
Worked exampleNeed help? Ask Jenkins
Jenkins · Your Safety Concierge
What brings you here today? Choose what you’re working on, or tell Jenkins about your situation.
Jenkins matches your words to published starting points. Keep names and private job details in your working draft. Suitable free resources come first.
For managers
Does the team have what it needs to carry out the plan? Give the crew time, equipment and support, and make it clear who will resolve anything that is missing.
Manager checks and supporting resources
Confirm the people doing the work have the time, equipment, information and support to carry out the plan. Agree who checks the controls and who resolves open actions.
Questions to resolve before work
- Which exact pump instructions define permitted external cleaning access, tools and the energy-isolation boundaries?
- Who locks, tags and verifies every hazardous energy source before permitted guard or tool access?
- Who verifies guard restoration and personnel clearance before the controlled return to service?
Training and qualifications to confirm
- Model-specific instruction for permitted external hopper cleaning, guard handling, washwater capture and recognition of work outside routine cleaning.
- Authorized-person instruction on the employer’s pump-specific energy-isolation, verification and controlled restoration procedure, including residual hydraulic and mechanical hazards.
Confirm the actual training evidence for the assigned people. A toolbox talk does not establish competence.
Decisions that change the plan
Can the agitator be jogged to expose a dirty area while a cleaning tool is still present?
No. Maintain the verified isolation and remove the affected work from routine cleaning if the permitted method cannot reach it safely. Obtain the manufacturer’s applicable servicing direction and a separate authorized plan. This example never permits cycling a component around a person or tool to finish cleaning and supplies no residual-pressure release recipe.
What must the crew record for actual use?
Record pump and instruction identity, permitted access, tools, delivery-system status and authorized roles. Document actual energy sources, lock/tag verification, guard restoration, personnel clearance, defects and equipment disposition. Identify separately held servicing and receiving operator; this plan supplies no completed inspection record.
Keep planning connected
Resources that support this JHA
Additional tools for task planning and safe work. Start with the free resources; explore paid options only when they meet an additional need.
Toolbox talks for the work
Prepare a practical crew discussion.
Energy Isolation: Verify Before Servicing →Wet Concrete: Prevent Skin and Eye Contact →Powered Tools: Check the Tool, Guard and Accessory →
Safety program resources
Review procedures, roles, and requirements.
Browse the existing catalog and confirm the scope and purchase availability of each program.
Browse safety programs →
Paid service · Availability
Task-specific training and qualifications
Explore applicable training and qualification needs.
Task-specific training services are not currently available to book here. Start with the free training-needs lookup; a toolbox talk or online course alone does not establish competence or employer authorization.
Review training needs · Free →People, equipment, emergency arrangements and open actions are recorded in the guided JHA’s Crew review step.
Open the crew review step →For safety professionals
How do we know the planning process and controls are working? Connect what the crew reports with field checks, risk decisions and the evidence behind your system.
Industry context, SIF, control verification and AHA review
Guidance and evidence
Review the method, risk decisions and evidence behind the plan. Use the actual jurisdiction, equipment instructions, employer process and project requirements.
Task-by-task control and verification rationale
1. Define the permitted cleaning boundary
Hazard: A delivery-line cleanout plan or an assumed empty hopper can be mistaken for authority to access moving concrete valves or an agitator.
Control: Pump operator and cleaning lead identify the exact pump and current routine cleaning instructions. Establish permitted external access and tools, required isolation and washwater capture. Confirm the delivery system’s separate safe status and assign authorized isolation and restoration roles. Keep hardened deposits, uncertain line conditions and repairs outside this routine operation.
Verification: Lead verifies model instructions, permitted access and assigned roles.
Why this belongs in the analysis: Defined access prevents cleanup becoming unplanned invasive servicing.
2. Prepare protected external positions
Hazard: Wet concrete contact, an unstable work position or a person beside the pump can cause burns, falls or exposure when cleaning begins.
Control: Crew establishes stable external access, hose routing and a restricted area around the hopper and washwater collection. Provide task-selected eye, skin and footwear protection and accessible washing arrangements. Remove pressure to work from a wheel, frame member or unsupported platform; keep neighboring crews clear and prevent collected washwater entering walking routes or drains.
Verification: Lead checks protected access, containment and the restricted area.
Why this belongs in the analysis: Workers need protection throughout the permitted external cleaning reach.
3. Isolate and verify hazardous energy
Hazard: Unexpected starting, residual hydraulic force or component movement can crush a worker or drive a cleaning tool back toward the operator.
Control: Authorized personnel follow the actual pump-specific procedure to identify, isolate, lock and tag every hazardous energy source and control residual energy and possible movement. Perform the prescribed verification before releasing permitted guard removal or tool access. Do not use the hopper interlock, emergency stop, an idle engine or a single gauge as a substitute for the required verified condition.
Verification: Authorized person reports actual isolation and verification findings before access.
Why this belongs in the analysis: Quiet machinery does not prove that hazardous energy is controlled.
4. Clean only the permitted external areas
Hazard: Overreaching, unsuitable tools or forced removal of set concrete can put a person into the mechanism, damage components or spray caustic residue.
Control: Crew follows the model’s routine cleaning method using its permitted tools and external positions while isolation remains controlled. Capture rinse and residues through the planned receiver. Keep body parts outside the hopper and mechanism; stop if the reach, deposits or obstruction exceed the routine method. Obtain a separate servicing plan rather than leaning in, cycling the agitator or hammering hardened material.
Verification: Lead observes that tools and reach remain within permitted boundaries.
Why this belongs in the analysis: Stubborn deposits do not justify changing access or isolation.
5. Restore guards before releasing the cleaning area
Hazard: A missing grate, retained tool or defeated interlock can leave dangerous access available when the pump is restarted.
Control: After permitted cleaning, account for tools and residues and restore every affected guard and safety device according to the model instructions. Report damage for authorized correction and maintain the out-of-service condition until required findings are resolved. Keep isolation under the authorized person’s control; the cleaning crew’s completion statement alone does not release a restart.
Verification: Operator verifies guard restoration and unresolved defects before restoration.
Why this belongs in the analysis: Restored guarding protects the next equipment operating stage.
6. Complete the controlled return and handover
Hazard: Premature energy restoration or unclear ownership can expose someone still cleaning or send an unresolved defect to the next operator.
Control: Authorized personnel use the employer’s controlled restoration procedure after confirming all affected people are clear, tools removed and required guards restored. Operator performs only the prescribed protected readiness checks. Record cleaning completion, isolation and restoration findings and any held equipment; communicate residual cleanup and maintenance restrictions to the receiving lead without inventing a successful inspection.
Verification: Lead verifies clearance, responsible restoration and recorded equipment disposition.
Why this belongs in the analysis: Cleaning completion alone does not authorize the next use.
Compare control wording
| Needs improvement | More useful for this scenario |
|---|---|
| The hopper grate stops the machine; lift it and rinse. | Authorized personnel isolate, lock, tag and verify all hazardous energy before the permitted guard or tool access hold point. |
| Cleaning is done; start the pump. | Operator verifies guard restoration and defects, then the authorized restoration process confirms personnel clearance and equipment disposition. |
Common questions
Can this example be used as a JSA?
Adapt the Task | Hazard | Control analysis to the employer’s JSA and actual work. Confirm assigned checks and record real findings before use.
What changes if the project requires an AHA?
Use the project’s governing AHA format, risk method and acceptance process. The published formwork AHA illustrates additional structure; this example supplies no AHA risk rating or acceptance.
Are these resources part of a paid course?
This walkthrough, browser draft builder and downloads are free public resources, separate from Academy course enrollment.
References and source note
- OSHA 1926.702 Concrete construction equipment and lockout/tagout
- Schwing Boom Pump Safety: hopper and protective-device planning
- OSHA 1926.300 General tool and equipment guarding requirements
Original instructional scenario with planned controls. Primary references support hazard planning. Use actual equipment and product instructions, project design and employer requirements to establish field criteria. This example supplies no inspection findings or work authorization. Use actual equipment instructions and site requirements alongside these references. Reference review: October 9, 2026.
Developed by Todd Jerome Jenkins, MS, CSP · Edition v1.0 · October 13, 2026
Use the builder’s Print / Save as PDF action after signing in or accepting research participation.