JHA / JSA / AHA builderRemedial Cavity Wall Tie Installation JHA
A JHA breaks the work into steps, hazards and controls. Use this example to build a draft for your actual job and review it with your crew.
Just need the example? Download it here.For the crew
You know the work. Let’s turn that experience into a plan your crew can talk through. Start with today’s job, then check the steps together.
Let’s build your JHA.
Step 1 of 4 · Working draft
Your job
Tell Jenkins what you’re planning and where the work will happen. Use the actual job details.
Use the published example’s suggestions when they fit your task, or write your own steps. These are planned controls, not verified worksite conditions.
Describe an observable step, how someone could be harmed, and the control that acts on that hazard. Identify who checks it and what evidence is needed.
Walk through the plan with the people doing the work. Resolve missing controls and agree who checks them. Moving to the next step does not approve the work.
Confirm people, equipment and emergency arrangements
Record changes, checks, and open actions
Walk the work area, review with the crew, and resolve missing controls. Follow the required approval process. This tool does not judge completeness, verify signatures or authorize work.
Print your own JHA by signing in, or contribute the selected structured categories as a guest. Signing in does not require research participation. Written job details are processed to prepare your export and are stored on our server only if you save to your private company library.
Research purpose, data fields, retention and withdrawal · Privacy notice
Sign-in uses a free account. Your tab draft is retained for the return from sign-in.
Hosted organization saving requires active jSMS access and a company workspace. View jSMS plans.
The export uses landscape pages, task-only continuation pages and a Page X of Y footer in current Chrome or Edge. Review every page. Opening an export is not proof that the JHA was printed or used. The PDF includes its research choice and reference; the private withdrawal link stays in the export’s screen-only receipt.
Device storage and other draft options
Device copies may contain private job information. Clear them when using a shared device.
Your entries stay in this working draft as you move between steps. Required field checks, employer review and work authorization remain separate.
Your Remedial Cavity Wall Tie Installation JHA
Walk through the job in order. Use these possible hazards, planned controls and checks to start a conversation about your actual work.
011. Release the surveyed wall and tie plan
Possible hazards: An inadequately restrained outer wythe or unknown backing can move or fail during intervention.
Planned controls: Restoration lead checks the wall survey, material/service clearance, stabilization release and issued tie layout. Confirm the actual substrate-test basis and approved tie system; hold a detached or undocumented wall rather than using installation as an emergency support method.
Check before work: Lead records survey and design applicability before drilling.
022. Prepare access and drilling controls
Possible hazards: Fragments, silica or a struck support can expose workers while preparing installation positions.
Planned controls: Separate the ground-level work bay and protect any stabilization measures. Arrange the approved pilot-drilling and driving tools, task-specific dust controls and assessed protection, with safe reach and contained debris collection. Verify the planned positions without disturbing original ties.
Check before work: Lead checks tools, dust controls and mapped positions before preparation.
033. Make and inspect pilot holes
Possible hazards: An unsuitable drilling method can break out the cavity face or miss the required backing.
Planned controls: Use the selected remedial system’s actual drill mode, dimensions and location requirements. Stop for unexpected voids, weak mortar, obstructions or backing mismatch; refer changed conditions for technical disposition rather than enlarging a hole or switching to a more aggressive drill.
Check before work: Installer records actual pilot-hole and substrate findings against the issued criteria.
044. Install the specified mechanical ties
Possible hazards: Wrong tooling, tie length or incomplete engagement can leave apparent restraint without verified connection.
Planned controls: Use the system-approved driving attachment and identified ties in the released sequence. Maintain safe hand and tool positions, achieve the specified engagement and recess, and record resistance or installation anomalies. Do not add an unapproved resin or substitute a general fixture anchor.
Check before work: Installation lead checks tie identity and actual installation findings.
055. Perform the prescribed verification
Possible hazards: An improvised test load or failed connection can damage masonry and misrepresent acceptance.
Planned controls: Have assigned personnel perform the design’s specified verification or testing with suitable equipment and criteria. Separate the test reaction area, record actual results and keep failed or uncertain positions on hold for disposition; do not invent a universal pull-test threshold.
Check before work: Designated reviewer compares recorded findings with the project’s acceptance requirements.
066. Close and hand over the repair
Possible hazards: Premature removal of stabilization or unplanned extraction of old ties can expose an unresolved wall.
Planned controls: Finish pilot openings by the approved method and collect waste with dust controls. Transfer the actual tie map, test findings and open actions for acceptance. Retain required stabilization; address old ties or support removal only under their separately released plan.
Check before work: Receiving lead confirms acceptance status and continuing wall restrictions.
Example scope and starting conditions
A specialist restoration crew will install designed replacement mechanical ties through an existing ground-level masonry outer wythe into identified backing in an unoccupied work bay. Survey, any required stabilization and the actual substrate-testing basis are released before installation. This fictional learning example describes planned controls; it records no actual inspection or work authorization.
- The remedial design identifies wall construction, near and far substrates, tie system, locations, installation method and prescribed testing/acceptance criteria.
- Pilot drilling, driving and verification use the selected system’s actual tooling with task-specific dust and contact controls.
- Unsafe detached veneer, rebuilding, crack stitching, arbitrary proof-test loads and automatic removal of old ties are excluded.
Know when to pause
- Wall layers, backing or material condition differs from the survey and testing basis.
- Pilot breakout, abnormal driving response or an unstable outer wythe.
- Prescribed test criteria, technical disposition or stabilization release is absent.
After a pause, correct the condition, reassess the work, and obtain required authorization before restarting.
Free example and template
No account required. The worked example contains planned controls. The blank template is for your own work; neither includes fabricated inspection results, signatures or approval.
Worked exampleNeed help? Ask Jenkins
Jenkins · Your Safety Concierge
What brings you here today? Choose what you’re working on, or tell Jenkins about your situation.
Jenkins matches your words to published starting points. Keep names and private job details in your working draft. Suitable free resources come first.
For managers
Does the team have what it needs to carry out the plan? Give the crew time, equipment and support, and make it clear who will resolve anything that is missing.
Manager checks and supporting resources
Confirm the people doing the work have the time, equipment, information and support to carry out the plan. Agree who checks the controls and who resolves open actions.
Questions to resolve before work
- What survey and substrate tests release this existing wall for the proposed ties?
- How will the actual near and far materials and installation positions be verified?
- Who performs the specified acceptance tests and decides whether existing ties need separate treatment?
Training and qualifications to confirm
- The actual remedial-tie design, drilling/driving tools, substrate verification and required testing/acceptance roles.
- Task-specific silica and powered-tool instruction, wall-stability monitoring and limits on old-tie or support intervention.
Confirm the actual training evidence for the assigned people. A toolbox talk does not establish competence.
Decisions that change the plan
Must all original wall ties be removed after new ties are installed?
No removal is authorized here. The survey and remedial design must determine whether original ties require isolation or another treatment and how it can be performed safely. New tie installation does not establish that decision by itself.
What must the crew record for actual use?
Identify the actual equipment and work boundaries, responsible people, applicable criteria, inspection findings and open actions. Resolve changes with affected crews and obtain required project authorization before work.
Keep planning connected
Resources that support this JHA
Additional tools for task planning and safe work. Start with the free resources; explore paid options only when they meet an additional need.
Toolbox talks for the work
Prepare a practical crew discussion.
Building Safety: Report the Defect and Protect the Area →Silica: Verify Dust Controls Before Cutting →Powered Tools: Check the Tool, Guard and Accessory →
Safety program resources
Review procedures, roles, and requirements.
Browse the existing catalog and confirm the scope and purchase availability of each program.
Browse safety programs →
Paid service · Availability
Task-specific training and qualifications
Explore applicable training and qualification needs.
Task-specific training services are not currently available to book here. Start with the free training-needs lookup; a toolbox talk or online course alone does not establish competence or employer authorization.
Review training needs · Free →People, equipment, emergency arrangements and open actions are recorded in the guided JHA’s Crew review step.
Open the crew review step →For safety professionals
How do we know the planning process and controls are working? Connect what the crew reports with field checks, risk decisions and the evidence behind your system.
Industry context, SIF, control verification and AHA review
Guidance and evidence
Review the method, risk decisions and evidence behind the plan. Use the actual jurisdiction, equipment instructions, employer process and project requirements.
Task-by-task control and verification rationale
1. Release the surveyed wall and tie plan
Hazard: An inadequately restrained outer wythe or unknown backing can move or fail during intervention.
Control: Restoration lead checks the wall survey, material/service clearance, stabilization release and issued tie layout. Confirm the actual substrate-test basis and approved tie system; hold a detached or undocumented wall rather than using installation as an emergency support method.
Verification: Lead records survey and design applicability before drilling.
Why this belongs in the analysis: An existing closed cavity needs investigation beyond a visible brick face.
2. Prepare access and drilling controls
Hazard: Fragments, silica or a struck support can expose workers while preparing installation positions.
Control: Separate the ground-level work bay and protect any stabilization measures. Arrange the approved pilot-drilling and driving tools, task-specific dust controls and assessed protection, with safe reach and contained debris collection. Verify the planned positions without disturbing original ties.
Verification: Lead checks tools, dust controls and mapped positions before preparation.
Why this belongs in the analysis: The repair needs controlled access to both substrate layers through the closed facade.
3. Make and inspect pilot holes
Hazard: An unsuitable drilling method can break out the cavity face or miss the required backing.
Control: Use the selected remedial system’s actual drill mode, dimensions and location requirements. Stop for unexpected voids, weak mortar, obstructions or backing mismatch; refer changed conditions for technical disposition rather than enlarging a hole or switching to a more aggressive drill.
Verification: Installer records actual pilot-hole and substrate findings against the issued criteria.
Why this belongs in the analysis: The pilot hole affects whether the tie can engage the intended materials.
4. Install the specified mechanical ties
Hazard: Wrong tooling, tie length or incomplete engagement can leave apparent restraint without verified connection.
Control: Use the system-approved driving attachment and identified ties in the released sequence. Maintain safe hand and tool positions, achieve the specified engagement and recess, and record resistance or installation anomalies. Do not add an unapproved resin or substitute a general fixture anchor.
Verification: Installation lead checks tie identity and actual installation findings.
Why this belongs in the analysis: This is a connection between existing wythes, not an anchor for an added fixture.
5. Perform the prescribed verification
Hazard: An improvised test load or failed connection can damage masonry and misrepresent acceptance.
Control: Have assigned personnel perform the design’s specified verification or testing with suitable equipment and criteria. Separate the test reaction area, record actual results and keep failed or uncertain positions on hold for disposition; do not invent a universal pull-test threshold.
Verification: Designated reviewer compares recorded findings with the project’s acceptance requirements.
Why this belongs in the analysis: A tie disappearing into the facade is not evidence of adequate engagement.
6. Close and hand over the repair
Hazard: Premature removal of stabilization or unplanned extraction of old ties can expose an unresolved wall.
Control: Finish pilot openings by the approved method and collect waste with dust controls. Transfer the actual tie map, test findings and open actions for acceptance. Retain required stabilization; address old ties or support removal only under their separately released plan.
Verification: Receiving lead confirms acceptance status and continuing wall restrictions.
Why this belongs in the analysis: Adding replacement ties does not automatically resolve every original-wall defect.
Compare control wording
| Needs improvement | More useful for this scenario |
|---|---|
| Work carefully and wear PPE. | Use the selected remedial system’s actual drill mode, dimensions and location requirements. Stop for unexpected voids, weak mortar, obstructions or backing mismatch; refer changed conditions for technical disposition rather than enlarging a hole or switching to a more aggressive drill. |
| Check that everything is ready. | Restoration lead checks the wall survey, material/service clearance, stabilization release and issued tie layout. Confirm the actual substrate-test basis and approved tie system; hold a detached or undocumented wall rather than using installation as an emergency support method. |
Common questions
Can this example be used as a JSA?
Adapt its Task | Hazard | Control analysis to the employer’s format and actual conditions. The example is a teaching aid, not evidence that controls were checked.
What changes if the project requires an AHA?
Use the governing AHA format, risk method, supporting records and acceptance process. The published formwork AHA demonstrates that additional structure; changing a JHA title does not supply it.
Are these resources part of a paid course?
This walkthrough, browser draft builder and downloads are free public resources, separate from Academy course enrollment.
References and source note
- Helifix DryFix Mechanical remedial tying system
- Helifix Remedial tie drilling and substrate testing guide
- OSHA 1926.1153 Respirable crystalline silica
Original instructional scenario with planned controls. Primary references support hazard planning. Use actual equipment and product instructions, project design and employer requirements to establish field criteria. This example supplies no inspection findings or work authorization. Use actual equipment instructions and site requirements alongside these references. Reference review: October 9, 2026.
Developed by Todd Jerome Jenkins, MS, CSP · Edition v1.0 · October 13, 2026
Use the builder’s Print / Save as PDF action after signing in or accepting research participation.