JHA / JSA / AHA builderLoad Bearing Rubble Stone Wall Construction JHA
A JHA breaks the work into steps, hazards and controls. Use this example to build a draft for your actual job and review it with your crew.
Just need the example? Download it here.For the crew
You know the work. Let’s turn that experience into a plan your crew can talk through. Start with today’s job, then check the steps together.
Let’s build your JHA.
Step 1 of 4 · Working draft
Your job
Tell Jenkins what you’re planning and where the work will happen. Use the actual job details.
Use the published example’s suggestions when they fit your task, or write your own steps. These are planned controls, not verified worksite conditions.
Describe an observable step, how someone could be harmed, and the control that acts on that hazard. Identify who checks it and what evidence is needed.
Walk through the plan with the people doing the work. Resolve missing controls and agree who checks them. Moving to the next step does not approve the work.
Confirm people, equipment and emergency arrangements
Record changes, checks, and open actions
Walk the work area, review with the crew, and resolve missing controls. Follow the required approval process. This tool does not judge completeness, verify signatures or authorize work.
Print your own JHA by signing in, or contribute the selected structured categories as a guest. Signing in does not require research participation. Written job details are processed to prepare your export and are stored on our server only if you save to your private company library.
Research purpose, data fields, retention and withdrawal · Privacy notice
Sign-in uses a free account. Your tab draft is retained for the return from sign-in.
Hosted organization saving requires active jSMS access and a company workspace. View jSMS plans.
The export uses landscape pages, task-only continuation pages and a Page X of Y footer in current Chrome or Edge. Review every page. Opening an export is not proof that the JHA was printed or used. The PDF includes its research choice and reference; the private withdrawal link stays in the export’s screen-only receipt.
Device storage and other draft options
Device copies may contain private job information. Clear them when using a shared device.
Your entries stay in this working draft as you move between steps. Required field checks, employer review and work authorization remain separate.
Your Load Bearing Rubble Stone Wall Construction JHA
Walk through the job in order. Use these possible hazards, planned controls and checks to start a conversation about your actual work.
011. Release the complete solid-wall section
Possible hazards: A face built as independent veneer or an unspecified core can fail to transfer the intended building loads.
Planned controls: Lead reviews the issued solid-wall detail, designer’s acceptance criteria and supplier information. Identify the approved section, bedding, bonders, mortar, hearting/pinnings, junctions and construction stages. Confirm temporary stability and loading hold points. Refer incomplete bond or core details to the designer before starting.
Check before work: Lead records the section identification and checks that face, core and connection requirements are explicit.
022. Prepare support, access and stone handling
Possible hazards: Weak bearing, unstable access or irregular heavy pieces can cause collapse, crushing or overexertion.
Planned controls: Verify released foundations and handed-over access for this wall section. Stage stones on stable supports, identify their weights/handling limits and keep fingers out of rolling and pinch paths. Mechanically assist pieces outside the accepted manual-handling method. Establish required wall restrictions and temporary support without overloading the foundation or access system.
Check before work: Lead checks stone staging, handling arrangements, access release and the available stability controls.
033. Establish the base stones and bedding
Possible hazards: Wrong natural bedding or uneven support can concentrate forces and allow stones to rock.
Planned controls: Select approved pre-dressed base stones and identify the supplier-specified bedding orientation. Place them in the issued mortar/support arrangement using the planned handling method. Check line, level, bearing and fit without balancing stones on loose wedges or inventing packing details. Hold unsuitable pieces for replacement or an accepted disposition; this task includes no on-site powered cutting.
Check before work: Named checker verifies bedding orientation and stable base placement before the next construction stage.
044. Build faces and core in the designed progression
Possible hazards: Separately advanced faces, voided cores or missing bonders can leave disconnected unstable masonry.
Planned controls: Build the faces and interior together in the issued course/lift sequence, installing each specified bonder stone and junction detail before it is hidden. Fill the designed hearting/pinning arrangement with the accepted materials and mortar method; do not treat miscellaneous dry rubble as an equivalent core. Maintain the permitted construction height and temporary restraint, stopping for movement or an unresolved fit.
Check before work: Checker observes and records bonders and core packing at the specified concealed-work stages.
055. Verify the section and protect incomplete work
Possible hazards: Unseen defects or unapproved loading can compromise a wall before mortar and permanent support are accepted.
Planned controls: Check alignment, section continuity, exposed joints and documented concealed details against actual project criteria. Correct defects only under an accepted method. Hold construction loads/overhead interfaces and maintain the current stage’s temporary support and weather protection. Control wet-mortar contact and dust during cleanup using the assessed exposure method.
Check before work: Masonry lead records section checks, corrections and any hold on upper work or loading.
066. Protect curing and transfer acceptance holds
Possible hazards: Uncontrolled weather, later alteration or premature support removal can defeat the completed section.
Planned controls: Maintain the specified cure/weather protection and inspect required temporary support from accepted safe access. Record materials, placement conditions, bond/core inspections and remaining interfaces. Hand over the section’s loading and support restrictions to the receiving supervisor. Obtain the actual designer/project acceptance before adding building loads; temporary-support removal is outside this operation.
Check before work: Lead records the protected state and identifies who controls the next release and monitoring duties.
Example scope and starting conditions
A masonry crew will build one new engineer-designed solid load-bearing building-wall section from approved pre-dressed irregular natural stone. The issued US project detail governs stone bedding, coordinated face/core construction, mortar, bonder stones and specified hearting or pinnings. Work uses released supports and access and ends with protected curing before any building-load release. This fictional learning example describes planned controls; it records no actual inspection or work authorization.
- The US project design and stone supplier identify the complete solid-wall cross section, permitted stone/mortar, natural bedding orientation, bonders, interior packing and construction-stage stability.
- Foundation and handed-over access are released, with a handling plan for the actual stone weights and shapes; oversized pieces require the separately accepted mechanical handling method.
- Both stone-masonry and structural-wall connections are partial. Retaining/landscape walls, veneer, cladding, rebuilding/demolition, arches, on-site powered stone cutting and field design are excluded.
Know when to pause
- The solid-wall design, supplier bedding information, material acceptance or temporary-stability requirements are missing or conflicting.
- A stone rolls or rocks, an unapproved core/bonder substitution is proposed, alignment changes or concealed details cannot be checked.
- Handling/access controls fail, weather exceeds the accepted protection method or upper work/loading would precede the required release.
After a pause, correct the condition, reassess the work, and obtain required authorization before restarting.
Free example and template
No account required. The worked example contains planned controls. The blank template is for your own work; neither includes fabricated inspection results, signatures or approval.
Worked exampleNeed help? Ask Jenkins
Jenkins · Your Safety Concierge
What brings you here today? Choose what you’re working on, or tell Jenkins about your situation.
Jenkins matches your words to published starting points. Keep names and private job details in your working draft. Suitable free resources come first.
For managers
Does the team have what it needs to carry out the plan? Give the crew time, equipment and support, and make it clear who will resolve anything that is missing.
Manager checks and supporting resources
Confirm the people doing the work have the time, equipment, information and support to carry out the plan. Agree who checks the controls and who resolves open actions.
Questions to resolve before work
- How does the issued detail connect the wall faces and core into the intended load-bearing cross section?
- Which stone orientation and packing details come from the actual supplier/designer rather than appearance?
- How will the crew avoid placing building loads on the wall before its cure and permanent-support acceptance?
Training and qualifications to confirm
- Project-specific solid rubble construction covering bedding, coordinated face/core progression, bonders, mortar packing and inspection before details are hidden.
- Irregular-stone handling, temporary wall stability, handed-over access, cement/mortar exposure controls and reporting of unsuitable stones.
Confirm the actual training evidence for the assigned people. A toolbox talk does not establish competence.
Decisions that change the plan
Is this merely a stone version of the CMU resource?
Its solid irregular cross section requires supplier-defined natural bedding, coordinated face/core progression and designed cross-wall bonding/packing. The existing CMU method uses standardized hollow units and cells; veneer and cladding carry a different load path. This example completes a new solid building-wall method, not a new facing material on an existing wall.
What must the crew record for actual use?
Record the work boundary, design/equipment documents, responsible people, acceptance criteria, control findings and unresolved actions. Communicate restrictions and obtain required project authorization. This learning example supplies no evidence that a control was installed or accepted.
Keep planning connected
Resources that support this JHA
Additional tools for task planning and safe work. Start with the free resources; explore paid options only when they meet an additional need.
Toolbox talks for the work
Prepare a practical crew discussion.
Manual Handling: Change the Lift Before You Lift →Masonry Walls: Verify Bracing and Restricted Access →Scaffolds: Verify Readiness Before Access →
Safety program resources
Review procedures, roles, and requirements.
Browse the existing catalog and confirm the scope and purchase availability of each program.
Browse safety programs →
Paid service · Availability
Task-specific training and qualifications
Explore applicable training and qualification needs.
Task-specific training services are not currently available to book here. Start with the free training-needs lookup; a toolbox talk or online course alone does not establish competence or employer authorization.
Review training needs · Free →People, equipment, emergency arrangements and open actions are recorded in the guided JHA’s Crew review step.
Open the crew review step →For safety professionals
How do we know the planning process and controls are working? Connect what the crew reports with field checks, risk decisions and the evidence behind your system.
Industry context, SIF, control verification and AHA review
Guidance and evidence
Review the method, risk decisions and evidence behind the plan. Use the actual jurisdiction, equipment instructions, employer process and project requirements.
Task-by-task control and verification rationale
1. Release the complete solid-wall section
Hazard: A face built as independent veneer or an unspecified core can fail to transfer the intended building loads.
Control: Lead reviews the issued solid-wall detail, designer’s acceptance criteria and supplier information. Identify the approved section, bedding, bonders, mortar, hearting/pinnings, junctions and construction stages. Confirm temporary stability and loading hold points. Refer incomplete bond or core details to the designer before starting.
Verification: Lead records the section identification and checks that face, core and connection requirements are explicit.
Why this belongs in the analysis: A visually convincing face does not demonstrate a structurally connected wall thickness.
2. Prepare support, access and stone handling
Hazard: Weak bearing, unstable access or irregular heavy pieces can cause collapse, crushing or overexertion.
Control: Verify released foundations and handed-over access for this wall section. Stage stones on stable supports, identify their weights/handling limits and keep fingers out of rolling and pinch paths. Mechanically assist pieces outside the accepted manual-handling method. Establish required wall restrictions and temporary support without overloading the foundation or access system.
Verification: Lead checks stone staging, handling arrangements, access release and the available stability controls.
Why this belongs in the analysis: An irregular shape can roll despite a manageable nominal stone weight.
3. Establish the base stones and bedding
Hazard: Wrong natural bedding or uneven support can concentrate forces and allow stones to rock.
Control: Select approved pre-dressed base stones and identify the supplier-specified bedding orientation. Place them in the issued mortar/support arrangement using the planned handling method. Check line, level, bearing and fit without balancing stones on loose wedges or inventing packing details. Hold unsuitable pieces for replacement or an accepted disposition; this task includes no on-site powered cutting.
Verification: Named checker verifies bedding orientation and stable base placement before the next construction stage.
Why this belongs in the analysis: Orientation and continuous intended support affect how each stone carries load.
4. Build faces and core in the designed progression
Hazard: Separately advanced faces, voided cores or missing bonders can leave disconnected unstable masonry.
Control: Build the faces and interior together in the issued course/lift sequence, installing each specified bonder stone and junction detail before it is hidden. Fill the designed hearting/pinning arrangement with the accepted materials and mortar method; do not treat miscellaneous dry rubble as an equivalent core. Maintain the permitted construction height and temporary restraint, stopping for movement or an unresolved fit.
Verification: Checker observes and records bonders and core packing at the specified concealed-work stages.
Why this belongs in the analysis: Continuity across the wall cannot be inspected from the completed outside face.
5. Verify the section and protect incomplete work
Hazard: Unseen defects or unapproved loading can compromise a wall before mortar and permanent support are accepted.
Control: Check alignment, section continuity, exposed joints and documented concealed details against actual project criteria. Correct defects only under an accepted method. Hold construction loads/overhead interfaces and maintain the current stage’s temporary support and weather protection. Control wet-mortar contact and dust during cleanup using the assessed exposure method.
Verification: Masonry lead records section checks, corrections and any hold on upper work or loading.
Why this belongs in the analysis: Neither stone weight nor a firm surface proves the new wall is ready for loads.
6. Protect curing and transfer acceptance holds
Hazard: Uncontrolled weather, later alteration or premature support removal can defeat the completed section.
Control: Maintain the specified cure/weather protection and inspect required temporary support from accepted safe access. Record materials, placement conditions, bond/core inspections and remaining interfaces. Hand over the section’s loading and support restrictions to the receiving supervisor. Obtain the actual designer/project acceptance before adding building loads; temporary-support removal is outside this operation.
Verification: Lead records the protected state and identifies who controls the next release and monitoring duties.
Why this belongs in the analysis: New solid masonry needs a documented handover as well as completed stonework.
Compare control wording
| Needs improvement | More useful for this scenario |
|---|---|
| Lay attractive stones on both faces and fill the middle later. | Follow the issued coordinated face/core sequence, installing specified bonders and accepted hearting/pinnings while concealed details remain inspectable. |
| The wall is heavy and looks stable, so start the floor. | Maintain construction-stage restraint and the loading hold until actual cure, section continuity, permanent-support interfaces and required project acceptance are recorded. |
Common questions
Can this example be used as a JSA?
Adapt the Task | Hazard | Control sequence to the employer’s JSA and actual worksite. Name the control checkers and record findings; this fictional example supplies no completed inspection or authorization.
What changes if the project requires an AHA?
Use the governing AHA format, risk method, records and acceptance process. The published formwork AHA illustrates that structure. Add actual competencies, inspections and project reviews; renaming a JHA does not complete those requirements.
Are these resources part of a paid course?
This walkthrough, browser draft builder and downloads are free public resources, separate from Academy course enrollment.
References and source note
- Scottish Government Natural stone masonry in modern Scottish construction guidance
- Historic Environment Scotland: rubble masonry and pinnings context
- OSHA 1926.706 Requirements for masonry construction
Original instructional scenario with planned controls. Primary references support hazard planning. Use actual equipment and product instructions, project design and employer requirements to establish field criteria. This example supplies no inspection findings or work authorization. Use actual equipment instructions and site requirements alongside these references. Reference review: October 9, 2026.
Developed by Todd Jerome Jenkins, MS, CSP · Edition v1.0 · October 13, 2026
Use the builder’s Print / Save as PDF action after signing in or accepting research participation.